Comparative outcomes of surgical fixation versus conservative management in clavicle fractures:  A prospective cohort study.

Anup Kumar  Padamwar; Keyur  Jain

doi:10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i3.1770

Authors

Anup Kumar Padamwar Department of Orthopaedics, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial Government Medical College and Hospital , Kanker, Chattisgarh, India
Dr. Keyur Jain Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial Government Medical College and Hospital , Kanker, Chattisgarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i3.1770

Keywords:

Clavicle fracture, surgical fixation, conservative management, fracture union, shoulder function

Abstract

Background
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of conservative versus surgical intervention in patients with clavicle fractures.

Methods
A prospective study was conducted on 50 patients with clavicle fractures, allocated into two groups: 25 patients managed conservatively (arm sling) and 25 undergoing surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation with plates). Baseline characteristics, fracture union time, functional outcomes (Constant-Murley Shoulder Score), pain levels (Visual Analog Scale), complications, and return to work/activity time were recorded. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results
Baseline demographics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). The surgical group achieved significantly faster fracture union (9.2 ± 1.5 weeks) compared to the conservative group (13.5 ± 2.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes favored the surgical group (88.6 ± 6.2) over the conservative group (79.3 ± 7.8, p = 0.002). Nonunion and malunion were more frequent in the conservative group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively), while superficial wound infections occurred in 8% of surgical cases. Pain scores were significantly lower in the surgical group (1.3 ± 0.9) versus the conservative group (2.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.001). Return to work was earlier in the surgical group (10.5 ± 2.3 weeks) than in the conservative group (15.7 ± 3.1 weeks, p < 0.001).

Conclusion
Surgical intervention in clavicle fractures provides superior union time, functional outcomes, lower pain scores, and quicker return to activity compared to conservative management, with an acceptable complication profile.

Recommendations
Surgical fixation should be preferred for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in active individuals to ensure faster recovery and better function. Conservative treatment remains suitable for minimally displaced fractures or patients with lower functional demands. Larger studies with longer follow-up are encouraged.

Author Biographies

Anup Kumar Padamwar , Department of Orthopaedics, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial Government Medical College and Hospital , Kanker, Chattisgarh, India

Dr Anup Kumar Padamwar is working as an Assistant Professor in the department of Orthopaedics at Government Medical College, Kanker. He has done his MBBS and M S in Orthopaedics from Government Medical College, Nagpur.

Dr. Keyur Jain, Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial Government Medical College and Hospital , Kanker, Chattisgarh, India

Dr . Keyur Jain is working as a Junior Resident in the department of Orthopaedics, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi Memorial Government Medical College, Kanker. He has done his MBBS from the Government Medical College, Rajnandgaon.

References

. Micheloni GM, Tarallo L, Porcellini G, Catani F. Comparison between conservative treatment and plate fixation for displaced middle third clavicle fracture: clinical outcomes and complications. Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):48-53. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8995. PMID: 31821284; PMCID: PMC7233707.

Han X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Tan J. Comprehensive comparison between conservative therapy and surgical management for completely displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Int Orthop. 2024 Jul;48(7):1871-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06198-1 PMid:38713287 PMCid:PMC11176208

Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Ferrari BA, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 22;1(1): CD009363. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub3 PMid:30666620

Yadav V, Khare GN, Singh S, Kumaraswamy V, Sharma N, Rai AK, et al. A prospective study comparing conservative with operative treatment in patients with a 'floating shoulder', including assessment of the prognostic value of the glenopolar angle. Bone Joint J. 2013 Jun;95-B(6):815-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31060PMid:23723278

Daniilidis K, Raschke MJ, Vogt B, Herbort M, Schliemann B, Günther N, et al. Comparison between conservative and surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: outcome of 151 cases. Technol Health Care. 2013;21(2):143-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-130714 PMid:23510974

Kluijfhout WP, Tutuhatunewa ED, van Olden GDJ. Plate fixation of clavicle fractures: comparison between early and delayed surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):266-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.022 PMid:31473135

Liu GD, Tong SL, Ou S, Zhou LS, Fei J, Nan GX, et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1495-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1871-z PMid:23645080 PMCid:PMC3728389

Bhardwaj A, Sharma G, Patil A, Rahate V. Comparison of plate osteosynthesis versus non-operative management for mid-shaft clavicle fractures prospective study. Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1104-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.012 PMid:29704955

Biz C, Pozzuoli A, Belluzzi E, Scucchiari D, Bragazzi NL, Rossin A, et al. An Institutional Standardised Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures (ADMCFs): Conservative or Surgical Management for Active Patients? Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;11(13):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131883 PMid:37444717 PMCid:PMC10341159

Maheshwari P, Peshin C Sr, Agarwal D. Functional Outcomes in Surgically Treated Clavicle Fractures: A Longitudinal Observational Study. Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48081. doi: 10.7759/cureus 48081. PMID: 38046489; PMCID: PMC10689976.

Kumar AV, Ramachandra Kamath K, Salian PRV, Krishnamurthy SL, Annappa R, Keerthi I. Operative stabilisation versus non-operative management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. SICOT J. 2022;8:45. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022046 PMid:36426961 PMCid:PMC9879146

Narsaria N, Singh AK, Arun GR, Seth RR. Surgical fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: elastic intramedullary nailing versus precontoured plating. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Sep;15(3):165-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0298-7 PMid:24859367 PMCid:PMC4182648

Martin JR, Saunders PE, Phillips M, Mitchell SM, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2021 Aug;2(8):646-654. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO-2021-0112.R1 PMid:34402306 PMCid:PMC8384438

Mannan M, Hafeez U, Hassan A, Tahir R, Ajnin S. Functional Outcomes of Clavicle Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF). Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e72048. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72048