Erector spinae plane block versus local anaesthesia instillation via the surgical drain in mastectomy patients at a tertiary institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i2.2672Keywords:
Erector spinae plane block, mastectomy, postoperative analgesia, local anaesthesiaAbstract
Background: Analgesic strategies for breast cancer surgeries continue to evolve, with the focus on reducing reliance on opioids and improving recovery. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and local anaesthesia (LA) instillation via the surgical drain represent two distinct approaches. The primary objective was to compare postoperative pain scores using the universal pain assessment tool (UPAT) between the two groups at 6 and 24 hours.
Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in 66 female patients, aged over 18 years, classified ASA I-III and scheduled for elective unilateral mastectomy. Using purposive sampling, participants were allocated into Group E (n=33), who received ESPB with 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline before induction. In comparison, Group L (n=33) received postoperative instillation of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine via the surgical drain.
Results: Group E had significantly lower postoperative pain scores at 6 hours, median (1 vs 3, p=0.013) and 24 hours, median (1 vs 3, p<0.001), with a medium to large effect size at 24 hours. Group E required significantly less intraoperative morphine, median (3 mg vs 6 mg), p<0.001, experiencing longer time to first opioid request, median (10.4 vs 8.1 hours, p=0.03) and required less postoperative intravenous tramadol (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative analgesia and adjuvant requirements. The patients and surgical characteristics were comparable between the groups. No complications were reported in either group, and Group E showed higher patient satisfaction compared to Group L.
Conclusion: The ESPB provided more effective and superior postoperative analgesia than LA instillation via the surgical drain, as evidenced by the significantly lower pain scores and perioperative opioid consumption.
Recommendations: The authors recommend a randomised control trial comparing ESPB, TPVB and PEC with a large sample size, and presentation of research to breast surgeons to emphasise a paradigm shift.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Porter P. Westernising women's risks: Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:213-16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0708307
Clinical guidelines for breast cancer control and management. [Internet]. Department of Health. 2019 [cited 01 November]. Available from:https://knowledgehub.health.gov.za/elibrary/clinical-guidelines-breast-cancer-control-and-management.
Sherwin A, Buggy D. Anaesthesia for breast surgery. BJA Educ. 2018;18(11):342-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2018.08.002
Andersen K, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: A critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011;12(7):725-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005
Hadi M, McHugh G, Closs S. Impact of chronic pain on patients' quality of life: A comparative mixed-methods study. J Patient Exp. 2019;6(2):133-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518786013
Gordon D. Acute pain assessment tools: Let us move beyond simple pain ratings. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(5):565-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000225
Dugashvili G, Van den Berghe L, Menabde G, Janelidze M, Marks L. Use of the universal pain assessment tool for evaluating pain associated with temporo-mandibular disorders in youngsters with an intellectual disability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(1):e88-e94. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21584
Rojas K, Manasseh D, Flom P, Agbroko S, Bilbro N, Andaz C, et al. A pilot study of a breast surgery enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to eliminate narcotic prescription at discharge. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2018;171(3):621-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4859-y
FitzGerald S, Odor PM, Barron A, Pawa A. Breast surgery and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33(1):95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.003
Forero M, Adhikary S, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin K. The erector spinae plane block: A novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
El Ghamry MR, Amer AF. Role of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in pain control after modified radical mastectomy. A prospective randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(12):1008-14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_310_19
Oezel L, Hughes A, Onyekwere I, Wang Z, Arzani A, Okano I, et al. Procedure-specific complications associated with ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective analysis of 342 consecutive cases. J Pain Res. 2022;15:655-6 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S354111
Westbrook A, Buggy D. Anaesthesia for breast surgery. BJA CEPD Reviews. 2003;3(5):151-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjacepd/mkg151
McNeill J, Sherwood G, Starck P, Thompson C. Assessing clinical outcome: Patient satisfaction with pain management. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998;16(1):29-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(98)00034-7
Jonnavithula N, Khandelia H, Durga P, Ramachandran G. Role of wound instillation with bupivacaine through surgical drains for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.149443
Talbot H, Hutchinson S, Edbrooke D, Wrench I, Kohlhardt S. Evaluation of a local anaesthesia regimen following mastectomy. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(7):664-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03795.x
Fallon M, Dierberger K, Leng M, Hall PS, Allende S, Sabar R, et al. An international, open-label, randomised trial comparing a two-step approach versus the standard three-step approach of the WHO analgesic ladder in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(12):1296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.083
Simpson G, Jackson M. Perioperative management of opioid-tolerant patients. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):124-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkw049
Variawa M, Scribante J, Perrie H, Chetty S. The prevalence of chronic postmastectomy pain in female breast cancer survivors. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2016;22(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2016.1191214
Tshiteta P, Lushiku T, Sehlapelo M. An observational study evaluating the perioperative efficacy of the pectoralis nerve blocks. 2023 (unpublished).
Ates I, Disci E, Yayik A. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus trocar site local anesthetic infiltration for laparoscopic colorectal resection: A prospective, randomized study. Annals of Medical Research. 2022;29(1). https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2021.03.297
Ramachandran S, Ramaraj K, Velayudhan S, Shanmugam B, Kuppusamy S, Lazarus S. Comparison of erector spinae plane block and local anaesthetic infiltration of the incision site for postoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A randomised parallel-group study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65(5):398-403. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_1450_20
Thomas M. Advances in oncoanaesthesia and cancer pain. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;29:100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100491
Evans M, Wigmore T, Kelliher L. The impact of anaesthetic technique upon outcome in oncological surgery. BJA Educ. 2019;19(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2018.09.008
Sheldon J, Nejthardt M, Quan C. South Africa Society of Anaesthesiologists Guidelines for Regional Anaesthesia in South Africa. 31 March 2016.
Milner A, Welch E. Applied pharmacology in anaesthesiology and critical care. 2nd ed.: Medpharm Publication; 2019.
Singh S, Kumar G, Akhileshwar. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy: A randomised control study. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(3):200-04. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_758_18
Malawat A, Verma K, Jethava D, Jethava D. Erector spinae plane block for complete surgical anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for breast surgeries: A prospective feasibility study of 30 cases. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(2):118-24. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_639_19
Xiong C, Han C, Zhao D, Peng W, Xu D, Lan Z. Postoperative analgesic effects of paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracic and breast surgery: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256611
Eksteen A, Wagner J, Kleyenstuber T, Kamerman P. Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024:104259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104259
Malawat A, Verma K, Jethava D, Jethava D. Erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section: A prospective randomized comparative study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36(2):201-06. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_116_19
Boules M, Goda A, Abdelhady M, Abu El-Nour Abd El-Azeem S, Hamed M. Comparison of analgesic effect between erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block after elective cesarean section: A prospective randomized single-blind controlled study. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1073-80. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S253343
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Neo Motaung, Dr. Kenalemodisa Mogotsi, Dr. Mathabe Sehlapelo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
















